Migrate from Corepoint Integration Engine (Lyniate) to Mirth Connect
Corepoint (now Lyniate) is commercial with a strong installed base in Cerner-heavy hospitals. We migrate teams off Corepoint to open-source Mirth Connect — channel-by-channel migration of Corepoint Filters and Routes to Mirth Channels and Transformers, parity testing, zero-downtime cutover — typically in 8 weeks for ≤20 channels, on a fixed-price sprint package starting at $34,500.
Talk About: Corepoint → Mirth Migration
Tell us about your environment in 60 seconds. A solutions architect will reach out within 24 hours to confirm scope.
Why Teams Do This Sprint
Licensing cost
Corepoint commercial licensing scales with channel count and message volume. Mirth Connect is open-source; the 5-year TCO delta typically exceeds $200K for a 20-channel deployment.
Cerner-heavy environments
Many Corepoint customers run Cerner. Mirth Connect's Cerner integration is mature and well-documented; the existing Cerner channel patterns translate cleanly.
Cloud-native flexibility
Mirth's container-native deployment story is more flexible than Corepoint's, especially for multi-tenant SaaS topologies and AWS GovCloud / Azure Gov deployments.
FHIR R4 maturity
Mirth's FHIR R4 implementation has converged with the spec faster. If your roadmap includes ONC (g)(10), payer-provider FHIR, or SMART Backend Auth, Mirth is the lower-friction path.
Open-source vendor neutrality
Lyniate's product portfolio (Rhapsody + Corepoint + others) creates strategic uncertainty. Open-source Mirth removes that variable.
Hiring economics
More Mirth engineers in the US labor market than Corepoint specialists — lower hiring cost, less key-person risk.
The Sprint, Week by Week
Fixed scope, fixed dates. You see exactly what happens in each week.
| Week | Phase | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | Discovery + Corepoint audit | Filter/Route inventory, complexity map, Cerner endpoint review |
| Week 2 | Mirth environment setup | Dev/staging/prod environments + monitoring stack |
| Weeks 3–5 | Filter/Route → Channel/Transformer migration | Per-channel rewrite with line-by-line parity tests |
| Week 6 | Parallel running | Both engines live; outputs diff'd and reconciled per channel |
| Week 7 | Production cutover | Traffic shifted in batches per channel; rollback plan ready |
| Week 8 | Corepoint decommission + handover | Documentation, runbooks, optional Silver managed support |
Mirth Connect vs Corepoint Integration Engine (Lyniate)
Honest comparison. Mirth wins on cost and flexibility; the other side has its own strengths.
| Dimension | Mirth Connect | Corepoint Integration Engine (Lyniate) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source + managed support | Per-channel commercial license + maintenance |
| Transformer language | JavaScript or Groovy | Corepoint Action Language (proprietary) |
| FHIR R4 maturity | Mature, US Core profiles | Improving |
| Out-of-the-box monitoring | Server Manager + Grafana stack | Strong native dashboard |
| Cloud-native deployment | Native Docker / K8s | VM-friendly |
| US talent pool | Large | Specialized, smaller |
| Single-vendor support | Open-source community + managed support | Single Lyniate contract |
| 5-year TCO (20 channels) | ~$540K | ~$720K+ |
When to Migrate, When to Stay
We'd rather you stay on a tool that's working than churn for the sake of it.
- ✓Licensing renewal is approaching
- ✓Your team is concerned about Lyniate's product portfolio direction
- ✓You're hiring and Corepoint talent is scarce
- ✓You want cloud-native deployment for new sites or SaaS topologies
- ·You depend heavily on Corepoint's out-of-the-box monitoring and dashboards (you'd need to rebuild equivalents in Grafana)
- ·You have a recent multi-year Lyniate contract paid in full
- ·Your team values single-vendor support over open-source flexibility
- ·Channel count is small and the TCO delta doesn't justify migration
Pricing — All Numbers Public
Three productized sprint sizes, plus an optional managed-support continuation.
60-minute call with a senior Mirth engineer. We review your Corepoint deployment, Filter/Route inventory, Cerner integration patterns, and produce a written effort estimate.
Corepoint → Mirth Sprint
Standard sprint. Discovery, environment, Filter/Route → Channel/Transformer rewrite with parity tests, parallel running, cutover, decommission.
Mid-Size Estate Migration
Adds extra weeks for the additional channels and a longer parallel-running window. Suited for hospital networks.
Enterprise Migration
For multi-site IDNs and complex regulatory environments. Includes dedicated PM and steering committee.