Taction Software — FHIR Integration with Mirth Connect
Migration Sprint · From $34,500

Migrate from Iguana to Mirth Connect — 8-Week Sprint, Zero-Downtime Cutover

Iguana licensing fees keep climbing. Mirth Connect (now NextGen Connect) is open-source, vendor-neutral, and runs the majority of US healthcare integration workloads. We move teams off Iguana — channel by channel, with parity testing and zero-downtime production cutover — typically in 8 weeks for a 20-channel deployment, on a fixed-price sprint package starting at $34,500.

Talk About: Iguana → Mirth Migration

Tell us about your environment in 60 seconds. A solutions architect will reach out within 24 hours to confirm scope.

What is 6 + 3 ?

Why Teams Do This Sprint

Licensing cost

Iguana is per-server commercial; Mirth Connect is open-source. The 5-year TCO difference for a 20-channel deployment typically runs $200K+, even after factoring in managed support.

Talent pool depth

There are dramatically more Mirth Connect / NextGen Connect engineers in the US labor market than Iguana specialists, which lowers your hiring cost and reduces key-person risk.

FHIR R4 maturity

Mirth's FHIR R4 implementation has converged with the spec faster than Iguana's. If your roadmap includes ONC (g)(10), payer-provider FHIR, or SMART on FHIR, Mirth is the lower-friction path.

Cloud-native deployment

Mirth runs cleanly in Docker on AWS ECS, Azure Container Apps, GCP Cloud Run, or Kubernetes. Iguana's deployment story is more rigid, especially for multi-tenant SaaS topologies.

Open-source extensibility

Mirth's Groovy and JavaScript transformer model is more familiar to most engineering teams than Iguana's Lua-only model. Hiring is easier; onboarding is faster.

Vendor-neutral roadmap

Open-source means no vendor lock-in. You're not negotiating against an annual renewal cycle for the next decade.

The Sprint, Week by Week

Fixed scope, fixed dates. You see exactly what happens in each week.

WeekPhaseOutcome
Week 1Discovery + Iguana auditChannel inventory, complexity map, risk register, environment access provisioned
Week 2Mirth Connect environment setupDev/staging/prod environments on AWS, Azure, GCP, or your data center
Weeks 3–5Channel-by-channel migrationLua → JavaScript/Groovy transformer rewrite, line-by-line parity tests, regression suite
Week 6Parallel runningBoth engines live in production; messages mirrored to both; outputs diff'd and reconciled
Week 7Production cutoverTraffic shifted in batches per channel; rollback plan ready; downstream systems validated
Week 8Iguana decommission + handoverDocumentation, runbooks, optional managed support transition (Silver tier from $6,800/mo)

Mirth Connect vs Iguana Integration Engine

Honest comparison. Mirth wins on cost and flexibility; the other side has its own strengths.

DimensionMirth ConnectIguana Integration Engine
Pricing modelOpen-source + managed supportPer-server commercial license + maintenance
Transformer languageJavaScript or GroovyLua only
FHIR R4 maturityMature, US Core profilesCatching up
Cloud-native deploymentDocker, K8s, ECS/Cloud Run nativeVM-friendly, container support added later
US talent poolLargeSpecialized, smaller
Vendor lock-inNone — open sourceCommercial vendor relationship
5-year TCO (20 channels, w/ support)~$540K~$750K+

When to Migrate, When to Stay

We'd rather you stay on a tool that's working than churn for the sake of it.

Migrate when…
  • You're hitting a license renewal cycle and the next renewal hurts
  • You're hiring and Iguana talent is scarce in your market
  • Your roadmap includes FHIR R4, ONC (g)(10), or SMART Backend Auth
  • You want cloud-native containerized deployment
  • You want vendor-neutral architecture for the next decade
Stay on Iguana when…
  • ·Your Iguana deployment is stable, paid for, and not on a renewal cliff
  • ·Your team has deep institutional Lua expertise
  • ·Migration cost exceeds the 5-year TCO delta — true for very small deployments
  • ·You depend on Iguana-specific monitoring features your team hasn't replaced yet
Productized Pricing

Pricing — All Numbers Public

Three productized sprint sizes, plus an optional managed-support continuation.

🎁
Free Assessment

60-minute call with a senior Mirth engineer. We review your Iguana deployment, channel count, complexity, and produce a written go/no-go effort estimate. No commitment.

Claim Free Assessment

Iguana → Mirth Migration Sprint

From $34,500
8 weeks · ≤20 channels

Standard sprint package. Discovery, environment setup, channel-by-channel rewrite with parity testing, parallel running, cutover, decommission. Fixed price, fixed timeline.

Iguana Migration, Mid-Size Estate

From $62,500
12 weeks · 20–50 channels

Adds extra weeks for the additional channels and a longer parallel-running window. Suited for regional health systems and multi-site practices.

Enterprise Migration

From $118,000
16 weeks · 50+ channels

For large estates with custom Lua scripts, multi-tenant deployments, and complex regulatory testing. Includes dedicated PM and steering committee.

Continue with managed Silver Mirth Connect support after the sprint — from $6,800/month.
Not ready to commit? Start with a free Mirth Health Check — a senior engineer reviews your situation and confirms whether this sprint is the right fit. See all integration sprints, or browse our Mirth Connect support homepage.
FAQ

Iguana → Mirth Migration — FAQ

Will my Lua transformer logic work in Mirth Connect?
No — Mirth uses JavaScript or Groovy, not Lua. We rewrite each transformer manually with line-by-line parity testing. Most translations are 1:1 since both languages are imperative and the message-shape transformations are similar; the rewrite typically takes 2–4 hours per channel.
Can we migrate channel by channel or do we need a big-bang cutover?
Channel by channel. Our default approach runs Iguana and Mirth in parallel for 1–2 weeks per critical channel, with output diffing. Big-bang cutover is technically possible for very small estates but unnecessarily risky — we don't recommend it.
What about Iguana's built-in monitoring dashboard?
Mirth Connect Server Manager covers basic operational monitoring. For richer dashboards we deploy Grafana + Prometheus or integrate with your existing observability stack (Datadog, New Relic, Splunk, Honeycomb). The replacement is typically more flexible than Iguana's native dashboard, just less out-of-the-box.
Can you run Mirth Connect on the same hardware as Iguana?
Yes, but most teams take the migration as an opportunity to move to containerized deployment on AWS ECS, Azure Container Apps, GCP Cloud Run, or Kubernetes. Same-hardware deployment works for short-term parallel running, then we typically containerize after cutover.
What's the typical 5-year TCO comparison?
For a 20-channel deployment, Iguana over 5 years (license + maintenance + internal staff time) typically runs $750K+. The Mirth Connect path (open-source + Silver managed support at $6,800/month for 5 years + the migration sprint) runs ~$540K. The exact delta depends on channel count and your internal labor cost; we model it in writing during the free assessment.