Taction Software — FHIR Integration with Mirth Connect
Migration Sprint · From $34,500

Migrate from Rhapsody Integration Engine to Mirth Connect

Rhapsody licensing exceeds $50K/year for a typical 10-channel deployment. Mirth Connect is open-source with optional managed support. We migrate teams off Rhapsody — JavaScript-to-JavaScript transformer translation, parity testing, zero-downtime cutover — typically in 6–8 weeks for ≤20 channels. JS-to-JS translation is faster than Lua-to-JS, so 30-channel projects often complete in 6 weeks instead of 8.

Talk About: Rhapsody → Mirth Migration

Tell us about your environment in 60 seconds. A solutions architect will reach out within 24 hours to confirm scope.

What is 10 + 10 ?

Why Teams Do This Sprint

Licensing cost

Rhapsody is per-channel commercial. A 10-channel deployment typically runs $50K+/year on license alone, before maintenance. Mirth Connect is open-source.

Faster translation than Iguana

Both Rhapsody and Mirth use JavaScript for transformers. Translation is 1:1 for most cases, which compresses the migration timeline by ~25% vs Iguana.

Cloud-native deployment

Mirth Connect runs natively in containers and on managed cloud platforms. Rhapsody's deployment story is improving but still less flexible for SaaS topologies.

FHIR R4 + SMART on FHIR

Mirth's FHIR R4 implementation is mature and US Core profile-aligned. If your roadmap includes payer-provider FHIR, ONC certification, or SMART Backend Auth, Mirth is the clearer path.

US talent pool

More Mirth Connect engineers are available in the US labor market than Rhapsody specialists, which lowers your hiring cost and reduces key-person risk.

No vendor renewal cycle

Open-source means you're not negotiating against an annual renewal cycle. Costs are predictable and your roadmap is independent of vendor product strategy.

The Sprint, Week by Week

Fixed scope, fixed dates. You see exactly what happens in each week.

WeekPhaseOutcome
Week 1Discovery + Rhapsody auditChannel inventory, route map, terminology service usage assessed
Week 2Mirth environment setupDev/staging/prod environments provisioned
Weeks 3–4Channel + transformer translationJS → JS translation typically 50% faster than Iguana's Lua-to-JS
Week 5Parallel runningBoth engines live; outputs diff'd and reconciled per channel
Week 6Production cutover + decommissionCutover, runbooks, optional Silver managed support transition
Weeks 7–8 (if 20+ channels)Extended parallel + handoverAdditional parallel-running window for higher-volume estates

Mirth Connect vs Rhapsody Integration Engine

Honest comparison. Mirth wins on cost and flexibility; the other side has its own strengths.

DimensionMirth ConnectRhapsody Integration Engine
Pricing modelOpen-source + managed supportPer-channel commercial license + maintenance
Transformer languageJavaScript or GroovyJavaScript (similar)
FHIR R4 maturityMature, US Core profilesMature
Terminology servicesAdd via integration (Snowstorm, etc.)Strong native terminology server
Cloud-native deploymentNative Docker / K8sImproving — VM-friendly
US talent poolLargeSpecialized
5-year TCO (20 channels)~$540K~$680K+

When to Migrate, When to Stay

We'd rather you stay on a tool that's working than churn for the sake of it.

Migrate when…
  • License renewal is approaching and the next cycle hurts
  • You're hiring and Rhapsody talent is hard to find in your market
  • You want cloud-native containerized deployment for SaaS topologies
  • Your roadmap doesn't depend heavily on Rhapsody-specific features
Stay on Rhapsody when…
  • ·Your deployment depends heavily on Rhapsody's terminology services and you haven't planned a replacement (Snowstorm + integration)
  • ·Your team has deep Rhapsody-specific institutional knowledge
  • ·You have a recent multi-year contract that's already paid
  • ·Your channel count is small enough that the 5-year TCO delta doesn't justify migration
Productized Pricing

Pricing — All Numbers Public

Three productized sprint sizes, plus an optional managed-support continuation.

🎁
Free Assessment

60-minute call with a senior Mirth engineer. We assess your Rhapsody deployment, route inventory, terminology-service usage, and produce a written effort estimate.

Claim Free Assessment

Rhapsody → Mirth Sprint

From $34,500
6–8 weeks · ≤20 channels

Standard sprint package. Discovery, environment setup, JavaScript-to-JavaScript translation, parity testing, parallel running, cutover, decommission.

Mid-Size Estate Migration

From $58,500
10 weeks · 20–50 channels

Adds extra weeks for the additional channels and longer parallel running. Suited for regional health systems running multiple Rhapsody routes.

Enterprise Migration

From $108,000
14 weeks · 50+ channels

For large estates with terminology-service migration, multi-tenant deployments, and complex regulatory testing.

Continue with managed Silver Mirth Connect support after the sprint — from $6,800/month.
Not ready to commit? Start with a free Mirth Health Check — a senior engineer reviews your situation and confirms whether this sprint is the right fit. See all integration sprints, or browse our Mirth Connect support homepage.
FAQ

Rhapsody → Mirth Migration — FAQ

Is Rhapsody-to-Mirth migration risky?
Less risky than Iguana-to-Mirth because both engines use JavaScript transformers — most code translates 1:1. The risk concentrates in two places: routes that depend on Rhapsody terminology services (we replace with Snowstorm or your existing terminology stack), and routes with complex Rhapsody-specific filter chains (we rewrite as Mirth filter scripts).
What about Rhapsody's terminology server?
Rhapsody's terminology server is genuinely strong, and Mirth doesn't have a direct equivalent. We typically replace it by integrating Snowstorm (open-source SNOMED CT terminology server) or your existing terminology vendor (Apelon DTS, Health Language). The replacement is more flexible but takes a one-time setup cost — included in the migration sprint scope.
Can we run both engines simultaneously?
Yes, and we recommend it. Default approach runs Rhapsody and Mirth in parallel for 1–2 weeks per critical channel, with output diffing. Most critical channels migrate cleanly; the few that don't are usually terminology-service-related and we work them under the sprint scope.
What's the 5-year TCO comparison?
For a 20-channel deployment, Rhapsody over 5 years (license + maintenance + internal staff) typically runs $680K+. The Mirth path (open-source + Silver managed support + the migration sprint) runs ~$540K. Mid-size and enterprise estates see proportionally larger deltas because Rhapsody's per-channel licensing scales linearly.